A Review Of case laws on bail
A Review Of case laws on bail
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided from the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking inside the present case. In this sort of circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is also dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon with the prosecution against the petitioner and his earlier mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined because of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it proper to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Note: Please fill any area and Click on Search button, If you don't know the complete information please leave discipline blank.
The mentioned recovery might be used, at the most, for corroboration with the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be considered a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of prevalence. The stated memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as nothing was discovered because of such pointation. The place of occurrence plus the place of throwing the dead body were already while in the knowledge of witnesses previous to their pointation because of the petitioners. Reliance is also placed on case regulation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held via the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a very well-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could be a person or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for that decision of the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all can be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may be adopted in an argument.
There are plenty of cases where death was never meant – even more where Individuals nominated inside the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of a human being is a tragic event. But the death of any dwelling being isn't any considerably less a tragic event.
This system, to be used by members with the Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.
Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only finished Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence plus the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were properly mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر more info ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is properly set up now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service framework however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority could if happy that a civil servant who was entitled to be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his individual, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of shell out and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.